
Описание
In this episode, Courtney Cox, Associate Professor of Law at Fordham University School of Law, discusses her new article "Super-Dicta," which is published in the University of Pennsylvania Law Review. Cox begins by explaining what she means by "super-dicta," then reflects on what the concept can tell us about the judging process and jurisprudence more generally. Here is the abstract:A weird thing happens when a conscientious, rational judge lacks certainty and has the humility to know it: she will often decide cases for reasons that differ from the reasons in her opinions. To illustrate, suppose she thinks it’s 50/50 whether Defendant’s copying infringed or was fair use. She could rationally flip a coin. But if she does, and she finds for Defendant, it will not be because of fair use. Rather, it will be because she thought it was 50/50 whether the copying was fair use—and the coin landed tails.Coin-flip cases are rare, but uncertainty is not. There are more sophisticated tools for responding rationally when the judge’s doubts about what she ought to do are not in complete equipoise. And so, the point remains: when a judge is uncertain about what she ought to do and is rational in pursuit of that aim, the actual reason for her decision and the ratio decidendi will diverge. And unlike much of the literature arguing we cannot take opinions at face value, the phenomenon I describe arises from anti-cynical premises: a judge who aims at what is right.I call the judge’s actual reasoning “Super-Dicta.” Super-Dicta is so-called because it is super important: it is directly necessary to the decision—and not just causally, but as part of a judge’s rationale. But even though it is the decisive reasoning, it would appear to have the status of dicta: whether expressed, or not, Super-Dicta is not purely objective, limited to law or facts. It encompasses the judge’s subjective reasoning based on her uncertainty. That is, it is reasoning that resolves a case that is hard for the judge, not just hard.Should Super-Dicta appear in a
More By CC0/Public Domain...
- 1
Sam Williams on the Jokerfication of Law
CC0/Public Domain... · 3 713 прослушиваний · 58:56
- 2
Bearer-Friend & Polcz on Taxing AI
CC0/Public Domain... · 7 135 прослушиваний · 39:53
- 3
Nikola Datzov on AI Judges
CC0/Public Domain... · 7 547 прослушиваний · 46:04
- 4
Valentin Jeutner on Conceptual Legal Writing
CC0/Public Domain... · 3 061 прослушиваний · 43:34
- 5
Urice & Frankel on Art Law
CC0/Public Domain... · 3 782 прослушиваний · 36:28
- 6
Stephen Cicirelli on Philosophy, Literature, and Plagiarism
CC0/Public Domain... · 3 340 прослушиваний · 30:31
- 7
Bill Childs on Amusement Park Law
CC0/Public Domain... · 4 091 прослушиваний · 33:39
- 8
Mark Blankenship on the "Aesthetic Nondiscrimination" Doctrine
CC0/Public Domain... · 6 015 прослушиваний · 41:41
- 9
Jacob Schriner-Briggs on First Amendment Traditionalism
CC0/Public Domain... · 7 253 прослушиваний · 38:53
- 10
Davies & Ellis on Brakhage & Sartre
CC0/Public Domain... · 8 767 прослушиваний · 47:26
Вам также может понравиться
- 1
АльбомSAURAV
7 166 прослушиваний
- 2
АльбомEm Casa
4 193 прослушиваний
- 3
АльбомRachel is Kozi
Rachel is Kozi · 7 867 прослушиваний
- 4
АльбомBräxV1
Bryx1 · 9 579 прослушиваний
- 5
АльбомFreedom Heart
Freedom Heart · 6 142 прослушиваний
- 6
АльбомDINi 1
Plutonic · 8 058 прослушиваний
- 7
АльбомWe Are The Ocean
We Are The Ocean · 7 853 прослушиваний
- 8
АльбомWeazyy
Weazyy · 9 607 прослушиваний
- 9
АльбомTudy Cat
tudy Cat · 6 365 прослушиваний
- 10
АльбомBravo
4 744 прослушиваний
- 11
Альбом40Thavha
40Thavha · 2 862 прослушиваний
- 12
АльбомGANG
GANG · 7 796 прослушиваний