Qazi Faez Isa EXPOSED? Raftar BREAKS SILENCE!

विवरण

We reached out to former Chief Justice Qazi Faez Isa before releasing our explosive documentary but why did he refuse to give us an interview, and what changed after it went viral across Pakistan? Following the massive debate, he chose to respond through a journalist, defending his decisions involving Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf and Pakistan Muslim League (N), including controversial rulings on military courts and the bat symbol—but do his arguments tell the full story, or is there another side being ignored? In this podcast, we unpack the reality behind his claims, reveal what actually happened behind the scenes, and question whether the narrative being presented to the public matches the facts, especially after our further communication with him raised even more critical questions. #QaziFaezIsa #PakistanPolitics #SupremeCourt #BreakingNews #PoliticalPodcast #PTI #PMLN #MilitaryCourts #BatSymbol #PakistanNews #Exposed #Documentary #TruthRevealed #ViralPakistan #powerpolitics Please support us by subscribing to our channel, sharing our content, and engaging with us. Even if our work doesn't resonate with you, we'd appreciate your feedback. Raftar is not merely a content company that produces meticulously researched, high-quality videos about the economy, youth issues, gender roles, and sports. More than that, we represent a movement for social change. We cannot make a difference without your participation and support. For more amazing content, SUBSCRIBE NOW! YouTube https://www.youtube.com/@raftartv YouTube https://www.youtube.com/@raftarnewsofficial YouTube https://www.youtube.com/@raftarsports Website: https://raftar.com/ 00:00 – Intro: The Screenshot Controversy 04:45 – WhatsApp Proof of Refusal 10:30 – Allegations of Political Bias 14:50 – The Memogate Commission Role 18:40 – 2024 Election Date Credit 23:15 – Elections: A Fundamental Right? 28:30 – The 90-Day Deadline Violation 33:20 – LHC Order & RO Appointments 37:50 – The PTI "Bat" Symbol Verdict 42:45 – Reserved Seats Bench Dispute 47:15 – 26th A